Antipope heretic Karol Jozef Wojtyla aka John Paul II
(16.10.1978 – 2.04.2005)
The philosophical system of Karol Jozef Wojtyla originated with Edmund Husserl (1859-1938), a Jew born in what is now the Czech Republic.
He believed that it would be possible to use the methodology of the phenomenologist Max Scheler as a starting point for rebuilding Christian ethics.
All this was reflected in Wojtyla’s habilitation thesis entitled “Assessment of the possibility of basing Christian ethics on the assumptions of Max Scheler’s system”, written in the former Polish lands at the Marxist-controlled Jagiellonian University.
His contacts developed into a close friendship with the heretical antipope Paul VI and resulted in a rapid career in the hierarchy of the Vatican II sect.
He was appointed a member of the “pontifical commission” established to examine the possibility of integrating oral contraception (that is, grave sin) with Catholic moral theology.
The person who orchestrated the election of Wojtyla to the throne of the Vatican II Antichurch was the anticardinal Benelli – well known for his extremely modernist attitude.
Wojtyla, like his predecessor, Antipope John Paul I, refused to take the oath of office and to be crowned with the Tiara.
Heresies of Antipope John Paul II
In December 1983, before Lutherans in Rome, after praising the heretic Luther for his “profound piety”, he took part in the celebration of the 500th anniversary of Luther’s birth by participating in a Lutheran “service” in Rome. During this event, he wore a stole – a liturgical vestment which a priest should wear only when taking part in sacramental acts.
Pope Leo X, Decet Romanum Pontificem, January 3, 1521:
He (Martin Luther) has now been declared a heretic; and so also the followers of Martin’s pernicious and heretical sect must likewise share his punishments and his name, bearing everywhere the title ‘Lutheran’ and incurring the same punishments as he did.
Saint Pope Agatho said:
Whoever prays with heretics becomes a heretic himself.
Antipope John Paul II joined the Jewish “service” in the Roman synagogue, bowing his head while the words “we await the coming of the Messiah” were sung.
This is a clear denial of faith in Jesus Christ as the Messiah, and therefore a total rejection of the foundation of the Catholic Faith!
During his many trips to Africa, he received a “blessing” from snake worshipers, and during his journey to India he accepted “Tilak”, that is, a ritual mark on his forehead.
In Assisi, he prayed with animists and sectarians to their deities, that is, to demons.
He allowed Buddhists to place a statuette of Buddha on the tabernacle in the church in order to perform their rituals.
But the things which the heathens sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils and not to God. And I would not that you should be made partakers with devils. You cannot drink the chalice of the Lord and the chalice of devils: you cannot be partakers of the table of the Lord and of the table of devils. (1 Cor 10, 20-21)
The holy martyrs of the Catholic Church died martyrs’ deaths after terrible tortures for the Faith. Often this was only because they did not want to pay homage to other idols. And this heretical “Judas” did so with full awareness, while masquerading as the Holy Catholic Church.
Antipope John Paul II kissed the Koran and thereby confirmed that he was a heretic.
Thou shalt not have strange gods before me! (Wj 20, 3)
Thou shalt not have strange gods before me! (Wj 20, 3)
Following the example of his spiritual father, the heretical antipope Paul VI, he propagated the “cult of man”:
Man must be affirmed for his own sake … What is more, man must be loved because he is man; love must be claimed for man by reason of the particular dignity he possesses. (June 2, 1980).
In his book “The Sign of Contradiction” he juxtaposes the thoughts of the heretic Teilhard de Chardin with the Book of Genesis.
As an antibishop, he began introducing his “personalist” and “existential” ideas – described as his “Heideggerian-Husserlian-Schelerian concepts” – into the key document of the Vatican II Council entitled “Gaudium et spes”, also known as “the Church in the Modern World”.
This heretical document was even objectively described in the world as a “treatise unworthy of a Catholic Council” and “a dubious compromise with everything that lies at the root of all the evils afflicting humanity.”
Following his predecessors in the antichurch, he propagated the Neoplasm of the Mass as though it were the Catholic Mass.
On April 30, 1983, he presided over a concelebrated Neoplasm of the Mass in the huge Paul VI Hall in the Vatican under the auspices of the First International Congress of Priests and Religious, and 5,500 clergy of the Vatican II antichurch concelebrated with him, among them 18 Anglican clergymen, Lutheran and Reformed pastors, and several Orthodox “popes”.
His close friend was the arch-heretic Karl Rahner, the favorite of the modernist intellectual heretics and probably the most influential person in the Vatican II Antichurch, who was condemned by the last Pope, Pius XII, and “rehabilitated” by the heretical antipope Paul VI.
Apocatastasis, that is, the heresy that all people will be saved
The assumptions presented by Antipope John Paul II imply that all people are saved.
The use of the word “all” instead of “many” in the Neoplasm of the Mass of the Vatican II sect is therefore not accidental.
He made this clear on April 27, 1980, when he stated that:
Christ once and for all has obtained salvation for man – for every man and for all people, whom no one will be able to snatch from His hand … Who can alter the fact that we are redeemed – a fact as powerful and fundamental as creation itself. We have once more become the property of the Father thanks to that Love which does not shrink from the shame of the Cross in order to guarantee to all people: “no one shall snatch you from my hand” (Jn 10, 28). Today the Church proclaims the paschal certainty of the Resurrection, the certainty of salvation.
Almost the same is proclaimed in “Dives in misericordia”:
… that mystery of election refers to every man and woman, to the whole great human family. (4, 12).
And he repeats the same in “Redemptor hominis”:
… for each one is included in the mystery of the Redemption and with each one Christ has united himself for ever through this mystery. (13, 3)
The Catholic Church proclaims a completely different teaching, given for example by the Synod of Quierzy in 853:
Almighty God wills that all men without exception be saved, although not all men will attain salvation. The fact that some attain salvation is the gift of the saving God; but the fact that others perish is the fault of those who perish.
and from Holy Scripture:
He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved: but he that believeth not shall be condemned. (Mk 16, 16)
A fragment of his doctoral thesis entitled “The Question of Faith in Saint John of the Cross” (written at the Angelicum in Rome under the direction of Garrigou-Lagrange):
Faith … not only does not impart any knowledge or science, but, as we have said, it blinds the soul and deprives it of all other knowledge and science, which cannot judge properly. Other kinds of knowledge can be acquired by the light of the mind, but the knowledge that comes from faith is assimilated without the light of the mind. Faith negates the natural light, and if that light is not darkened, faith perishes.
Saint Paul preached exactly the opposite: that it is the unbelievers, those who have no faith, whose minds are blinded:
… In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them. (2 Kor 4, 4)
In his catechesis of April 14, 1982, he denied the superiority of virginity over marriage and accused of Manichean tendencies those who follow the Catholic doctrine expressed in Canon X of the Council of Trent (Session XXIV).
In a similar manner, he spoke this way at least eight times.
Thus he followed the path of the heretic Jovinian (4th century).
He proclaimed, among other things, the equal value of marriage and virginity chosen for the love of God, and that Catholics who rejected this view by preferring celibacy to marriage fell into Manichaeism.
Heresies of Karol Józef Wojtyła vs the Teaching of the Catholic Church
A comparison of statements and actions drawn from the teachings and life of Antipope John Paul II during his “pontificate”, which stand in open contradiction to Holy Scripture, the teaching of the Saints, and the Magisterium of the Catholic Church.
The Catholic Church, in all her beautiful Tradition, taught that all religions other than Catholicism are false and lead to eternal damnation, and that prayer with their followers is blasphemy. The heretical antipope John Paul II, however, thought otherwise.
Discover the Heresies of Antipope Karol Józef Wojtyła Based on His Book “Crossing the Threshold of Hope”
