Antipope Heretic Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli aka John XXIII
(28.10.1958 – 3.06.1963)
Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli was a liberal and a modernist from the very beginning.
This was most likely inspired in him by his first spiritual director, Parrechi, who was known for his “exceptionally liberal views”.
He had a tendency to make friends among modernists.
Among them were Carlo Ferrara and Cremony Bonomelli, both open modernists, as well as Lambert Beauduin, a “Benedictine” advocate of liturgical “renewal”. A few of his closest seminary friends, including a seminary roommate and a person who was present at his ordination, were later to be excommunicated for modernism.
He showed great caution all the time – he was undoubtedly hypocritical in concealing his views.
When he became a professor of patristics at the Lateran University, he was removed after only a few months due to “suspicion of modernism” and “preaching the theories of the heretic Rudolf Steiner”. He was sent into exile to Bulgaria and Turkey.
The Italian writer Pier Carpi claims that he possesses indisputable evidence that during his stay in the Middle East Roncalli was admitted into Freemasonry.
Maurice Bardet, a well-known Freemason, informs us in the Masonic publication “Les Echos du surnaturel” that he was his adviser. It was attested by several members of the French police assigned to his protection at that time that in Paris, every Thursday evening, dressed in civilian clothing, he visited the Grand Lodge of that city.
It is undisputed that the antipope John XXIII was under the influence of the heretic Teilhard de Chardin and of the widespread belief in development and progress.
Whenever the need arose, he simply contradicted the Catholic popes.
He completely rejected the Catholic encyclicals “Mirari Vos” and “Singulari Nos” of Gregory XVI, and “Quanta Cura” of Pius IX, to which the Syllabus was attached as an appendix.
When his friend asked him how he was managing as the successor to such a great man as Pope Pius XII, he answered impudently:
I try to imagine what my predecessor would do, and then I do exactly the opposite.
When journalists once asked him whether he would continue the line of his predecessor, Pius XII, he replied:
We will do exactly the opposite of what Pius XII would do.
In these statements, he himself proved that he is not a Catholic pope, but an antipope, because he was directed exactly against (anti) the last Catholic Pope, Pius XII.
As a Freemason, he therefore separated himself from the Catholic Church and created the Antichurch of Antichrist on the basis of the heretical Vatican II Council, which sought to persuade Catholics to adopt a new doctrine of false ecumenism and religious liberty, both of which remain and always will remain in contradiction to the teaching of the Catholic Church.
This council was a cunning maneuver calculated to bring about a change in ecclesiastical doctrine and discipline, thereby initiating the destruction of Catholicism in the souls of many people, and even of entire countries.
Heresies of Antipope John XXIII
Antipope John XXIII was the father of the Mass Neoplasm.
He changed the Canon of the Holy Mass, which has always been regarded by the Catholic Church as its most essential and unchangeable part, during which the bread and wine are transubstantiated into the Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, that is, the so-called rule according to which the Holy Mass is to be celebrated, dating back to apostolic times.
Thus, he inspired his successor antipope Paul VI, who, with the help of 6 Protestant “experts” and the Masonic antibishop Bugnini, also changed the very words of consecration and introduced words that the Lord Jesus never uttered.
He also limited the use of the psalm “Iudica me Deus”, as well as the reading of the Last Gospel, which soon led to their complete omission. He abolished the “Confiteor” before the communion of the faithful, as well as some signs of the cross in the Holy Mass. He also removed the final prayers after Mass, which Pope Leo XIII had introduced for the conversion of Russia and of sinners.
The Blessed Virgin Mary at Fatima demanded that her Third Secret of Fatima be revealed by the pope by the year 1960.
Antipope John XXIII did not heed the Mother of God, thereby proving once again that he was not a Catholic pope.
On June 25, 1959, in the encyclical “Ad Cathedram Petri”, he called non-Catholics separated brethren and sons.
The Catholic Church has always called them heretics, schismatics, pagans, or unbelievers.
By establishing the “Secretariat for Christian Unity” and by receiving Geoffrey Fischer, a Freemason of the Old Reptonian Lodge No. 3725 belonging to the Grand Lodge of England, and later the “Grand Chaplain” of the Mother Grand Lodge of the world, responsible for the philo-Protestant turn of Anglicanism, he sought to draw Catholics into the turbulent current of false ecumenism and prepare them for the heretical and blasphemous Vatican II Council.
During the official Bea-Fischer meeting, which took place in Rome at the residence of the anti-cardinal Bea, in the Brazilian Pontifical College, immediately after the anti-papal audience granted to Fischer by antipope John XXIII, Fischer himself stated that his visit to John XXIII should be regarded as an event of historical significance, but that even more important was the creation of the above-mentioned “Secretariat for Christian Unity”. For his visit is something passing, whereas that “Secretariat” is a permanent institution which will continue the work that has been begun.
The consequences of this satanic work:
1) “A free path” to countless initiatives of the same kind as the “Secretariat”.
2) An impulse given to the doctrine of the “Secretariat”, based on false ecumenism, and the support granted to it by the seat of the central Preparatory Commission for the heretical Vatican II Council.
3) An almost absolute success in the maneuvering aimed at the participation of heretical dissenters in the Vatican II Council in the role of “observers” or “guests”, together with the decisive influence of their presence on the Council itself.
Fischer’s visit enabled the free admission of heretics to the private apartment of antipope John XXIII.
A list of these heretics compiled by his secretary Capovilla:
• Bernard Pawley, “canon” at the cathedral in Ely (England) and personal representative of the “Archbishop” of Canterbury and the “Archbishop” of York (June 12, 1961)
• Arthur Lichtenberg, chairman of the American Episcopal Church (November 15, 1961)
• Joseph Jackson, chairman of the National Baptist Convention, USA (December 20, 1961)
• Archibald C. Craig, moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland (March 28, 1962)
• Mervyn Stockwood, Anglican bishop of Southwark (London) (April 7, 1962)
• Edmund Schlink DD, lecturer at the University of Heidelberg (Germany), representative of the Council of the Evangelical Church in Germany (April 27, 1962)
• Arthur Morris, Anglican bishop of St. Edmundsbury and Ipswich (May 10, 1962)
• “Metropolitan” Damaskinos de Volos (Greece) (May 17, 1962)
• Joost de Blank, Anglican archbishop of Cape Town, South Africa (June 20, 1962)
The Capovilla list ends before the heretical Council and is therefore incomplete. It does not include many other visits by representatives of false religions.
In these meetings the antipope continued the work of false ecumenism, in which there was not even the slightest mention of the conversion of dissenters and heretics to the true Catholic Faith.
On January 18, 1960, a delegation of the Judeo-Masonic lodge B’naï B’rith went to the Vatican to speak with the antipope about the sudden rise of antisemitism.
It came to express gratitude for the help given to persecuted Jews while he was papal nuncio in Turkey (1935-1944), and to thank him for removing the expression “perfidus” from the Good Friday liturgy.
In 1962, the Moscow Orthodox patriarch Nikodem, who was known to be a KGB agent, was received by antipope John XXIII, who invited him to take part in the Vatican II Council.
As a condition of his participation in the council, the patriarch obtained an assurance that communism would not be condemned. Antipope John XXIII agreed to this devilish condition. It is a completely false myth to claim that he, as well as antipope John Paul II, contributed to the “fall” of communism.
In 1963, the encyclical “Pacem in Terris” was published, in which antipope John XXIII called upon Catholics to enter into dialogue with communists.
Quote from this encyclical “Pacem in Terris”:
One of the most significant achievements of the United Nations was the declaration on human rights … which recognizes and supports respect for all the rights and freedoms that were mentioned in the declaration … This declaration solemnly, without exception, recognizes the dignity of all people and persons …
Antipope John XXIII could not have been pope, because he was a Freemason, and therefore, by virtue of the decrees of Catholic Popes, he was subject to excommunication and was not a member of the Catholic Church.
He therefore founded a new Antichurch of Antichrist within the bosom of the Catholic Church.
Logically, then, the subsequent antipopes of this antichurch, that is, his successors, also were not and are not popes; therefore they too supported and continue to support socialism, Freemasonry, and false religions.
